Science and the Book of Mormon
A few months ago, Sunstone had an article on LDS apologetics that was widely discussed at various blogs. The basic theme of the article was that those writing LDS apologetics are too critical and take criticism too personally. And why would a religious person would want to do apologetics? Aren’t faith and belief enough? The author saw three groups: Believers, who would believe what they believe regardless of any scientific evidence (often adopting readings that were incompatible with science). Critics, who would disbelieve Mormonism regardless of any evidence, since it would always fall short. Then there was this crazy group in the middle that kept trying to reconcile science and Mormonism, using each to interpret the other.

