<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best of the Box 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:22:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/#comment-32937</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=662#comment-32937</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, everyone. Nitsav, I&#039;m not sure what sort of moral we can draw from the episode narrated at Pure Mormonism (which I, too, heard about several years ago). Given changes in technology, it is no longer feasible to re-issue a revised Conference talk. So perhaps the lesson senior leaders draw is that pre-Conference screening is superior to post-Conference editing to insure that the wrong things don&#039;t get said (or the right things, but phrased in such a way that some people would take away the wrong message).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, everyone. Nitsav, I&#8217;m not sure what sort of moral we can draw from the episode narrated at Pure Mormonism (which I, too, heard about several years ago). Given changes in technology, it is no longer feasible to re-issue a revised Conference talk. So perhaps the lesson senior leaders draw is that pre-Conference screening is superior to post-Conference editing to insure that the wrong things don&#8217;t get said (or the right things, but phrased in such a way that some people would take away the wrong message).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquinas</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/#comment-32935</link>
		<dc:creator>aquinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=662#comment-32935</guid>
		<description>Dave, thanks for the shout-out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, thanks for the shout-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitsav</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/#comment-32934</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitsav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=662#comment-32934</guid>
		<description>Dave, it&#039;s interesting to note who&#039;s making the really positive comments over at &quot;Pure Mormonism&quot;- You&#039;ve got one of those Prophecy-centered guys (the LDS equivalent of Left Behinders, arch-conservative), a guy hypothesizing an LDS Martin Luther to come forth and break away from the Church for an LDS Reformation (One mighty and strong?), and Andrew S., notably friendly but definitely Ex-Mormon.

In any case, I wasn&#039;t a fan of the post or the comments, but then, I read this whole thing years ago, so the post had none of the power of novelty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, it&#8217;s interesting to note who&#8217;s making the really positive comments over at &#8220;Pure Mormonism&#8221;- You&#8217;ve got one of those Prophecy-centered guys (the LDS equivalent of Left Behinders, arch-conservative), a guy hypothesizing an LDS Martin Luther to come forth and break away from the Church for an LDS Reformation (One mighty and strong?), and Andrew S., notably friendly but definitely Ex-Mormon.</p>
<p>In any case, I wasn&#8217;t a fan of the post or the comments, but then, I read this whole thing years ago, so the post had none of the power of novelty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Cut</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/#comment-32933</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Cut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=662#comment-32933</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got great taste, Dave.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got great taste, Dave.  <img src='http://www.bloggernacle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/best-of-the-box-2-2/#comment-32932</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=662#comment-32932</guid>
		<description>Dave, as always an excellent feature.  Good to see you back in the saddle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, as always an excellent feature.  Good to see you back in the saddle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
