History is More or Less Bunk

By: Justin Butterfield - May 3, 2005

Even though some believe “history is more or less bunk,” the Bloggernacle performed well this week! Here are the highlights:

Times and Seasons broke long-standing historical precedent by asking historian Kathleen Flake a mere Eleven Questions, but she made a fine showing nonetheless.

In other developments:

Update from last week: Seller of rare, 1842 copy of the Book of Mormon dismisses insulting $26,000 bid.

2 Comments

  1. Let’s not forget the 11th History Carnival over at Studi Galileiani which Rosalynde Welch’s post here was honored as one of the best history blog posts of the month.

    Comment by Clark Goble — May 3, 2005 @ 10:25 pm

  2. Also I was somewhat disappointed that Kathleen Flake’s 12 Questions got so little feedback, even after Ben posted the link to her paper. That’s one of my all time favorites of Mormon scholarship and has been ever since I first read it years ago. I would have thought it controversial enough to have engendered at least some discussion. Maybe this will drum up some discussion at T&S? (Where the posts come fast enough at times that many I think miss them)

    Comment by Clark Goble — May 3, 2005 @ 10:28 pm