Joseph Smith Monument -1905 and 2005

By: Justin Butterfield - December 17, 2005

J.S. Monument

Today’s Salt Lake Tribune features a Peggy Fletcher Stack article on the capstone of this year’s celebration of Joseph Smith’s 200th birthday: a Joseph Smith Commemorative Broadcast on Friday, December 23 (6:00 pm MST), which will originate from the Conference Center and feature a coordinating broadcast from Joseph Smith’s birthplace in Sharon, Vermont. President Hinckley will speak from Vermont.

The broadcast will also mark 100 years since President Joseph F. Smith (back row, third from the right, in the photograph above) led a group of Latter-day Saints to dedicate a 38 1/2-foot high monument to Joseph Smith in December 1905. (The article features some 1905 photographs of the monument. Other photographs can be viewed here.)

Stack writes:

It was a moment of triumph and tenderness for the Mormon leaders who gathered there to remember and pay homage to their beloved leader, even as their church was being investigated, ridiculed and attacked by a congressional committee in Washington, D.C. Joseph F. Smith faced grueling questions about the church’s involvement in polygamy, its temple ceremonies and loyalty to the United States before the Congress would allow a Utah senator to be seated.

Kathleen Flake’s The Politics of American Religious Identity: The Seating of Senator Reed Smoot: Mormon Apostle argues that President Smith faced a crisis during the Smoot hearings. He “had to replace his people’s faith in one revelation [i.e., plural marriage] without undermining their confidence in all revelation, as well as the revelator, namely, Joseph Smith and himself as Smith’s prophetic successor” (p. 110). He chose to recast the focus of the church to Joseph Smith’s First Vision. Through his dedicatory prayer, President Smith identified the elements of Joseph Smith’s mission that would be carried into the next century: a restored foundation of apostles and prophets with Christ as the chief cornerstone, a base of continuing revelation upon which the church was built, and “an assertion of Joseph Smith’s revelatory power and divine authority bestowed to those that follow” (p. 115).

The 1905 dedication attracted national press. The Washington Post, for instance, carried a report from South Royalton, Vermont, that “[a] party of fifty Mormons arrived here to-day from Utah, Ohio, and New York, to be present to-morrow at the dedication of a monument erected to the memory of Prophet Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon faith, on the site of a farm house in Sharon, where he was born 100 years ago. President Joseph F. Smith and his second counsellor, Anthon H. Lund, accompanied by apostles, bishops, and representatives of the many branches of the Smith family came in a special car from Salt Lake City, and anothey [sic] party of Mormons came from New York” ( “Mormons in Vermont Town,” The Washington Post, Dec. 23, 1905, p. 11).

The following day the Post ran an story on the dedication ceremony. The article described the monument as made of “dark granite, highly polished” and stated that at slightly more than fifty feet tall, “it is said to be the largest polished granite monument in the country” ( “Memorial to Joseph Smith,” The Washington Post, Dec. 24, 1905, p. 5).

Writing in the February 1906 issue of the Improvement Era, Susa Young Gates described the moment of the monument’s unveiling: “[Edith Smith's] slender hand drew the rope which bound the Stars and Stripes about the polished base. A shout at once arose, and men reverently lifted their hats, while women wept with joy and gratitude that such a man had lived, had died, and now had been remembered.”

In its Christmas 1905 message, the First Presidency wrote:

The unveiling of the monument to the Prophet Joseph Smith, at Sharon, Windsor county, Vermont, on December 23—the one hundredth anniversary of his birth—is a cause of great congratulation to all who, believe in his divine mission. Slander, false witness and the shafts of malice are arrayed against the Church and its authorities, as may be expected until Satan is bound and falsehood is conquered by divine truth. It is our duty to bear such things with patience, and not permit ourselves to be aroused to anger or retaliation. We should stand up for the right, and as far as possible ignore the wrong-doers. The knowledge that God is with us, and that his work will prevail, should buoy us up under every difficulty and every trial, having the conviction that the Lord will cause even “the wrath of man to praise him.” The very efforts of the enemies of his Church to hedge up its way will be overruled by him to accelerate its advancement.

Of course President Hinckley’s journey to Sharon this week has its own ritual significance. As Stack notes, things have obviously changed since the dark days of 1905. “Since that dedication, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has flourished. It has more than 12 million members in more than 100 countries, temples across the globe, one of the largest full-time missionary corps, and a presence in national religious debates – to say nothing about a world-class genealogy library.”

It will be interesting to see how President Hinckley chooses to commemorate and memorialize the events of the last 100 years.

8 Comments

  1. Justin, thanks for this wonderful post. It is amazing to think of all the changes in the last 100 years and just how tumoltuous things were for the Church in 1905. Things have truely been revolutionized…makes you wonder what the next 100 years will bring.

    Comment by J. Stapley — December 17, 2005 @ 4:02 pm

  2. Great post, and very informative links, information, and photos to past articles and press accounts. It will be interesting to see the secular press reports this year.

    Comment by Guy Murray — December 17, 2005 @ 7:11 pm

  3. With the idea the Joseph F. Smith organized a new focus on Joseph Smith’s first vision, I have a curiousity about the hymn now called Joseph Smith’s First Vision. I don’t know when George Manwaring (1854-1889) wrote the lyrics, but obviously it was before 1890. Was this an obscure, peripheral hymn until Joseph F. Smith gave it relevance?

    Also, who is the slighly separate figure in the back row on the left?

    Comment by John Mansfield — December 21, 2005 @ 10:25 am

  4. Your question about that hymn raises a good point.

    I understand that Manwaring’s hymn was popular when it first appeared and has enjoyed popularity over the years (it was sung several times during December 1905 centennial activities). Michael Hicks, author of Mormonism and Music, calls it the most popular of the sacred ballads published in the Juvenile Instructor in the 1870s. (It was written around 1878–inspired by a C.C.A. Christensen painting of the First Vision–and published in 1878 after being rewritten by Ebenezer Beesley.)

    I don’t believe that Flake mentions the hymn in her book, but I think her thesis accounts for it. Her argument is that the First Vision really came into its own around 1905 and ensuing years. She doesn’t really dispute James Allen’s findings (“The Significance of Joseph Smith’s First Vision in Mormon Thought,” Dialogue 1.3 [Autumn 1966]: 29-45) that it enjoyed (growing) importance as a missionary tool and source of doctrine in the decades leading up to the early twentieth century (e.g., several published accounts in the 1840s, inclusion in the Pearl of Great Price in 1851, placement in the scriptures in 1880, sermons using it to teach the doctrine of deity in the early 1880s).

    Flake argues that appreciation for the First Vision continued to grow in the 1890s, but it was not until the early twentieth century that it “move[d] to the fore of Latter-day Saint self-representation.” She suggests that Allen’s research shows that the turning point in the First Vision’s status occurred during President Joseph F. Smith’s administration (i.e., contemporaneous with the Smoot hearing and afterward). As she points out, the story was first used in Sunday School texts in 1905, priesthood manuals in 1909, in a separate missionary tract in 1910, and in histories of the church in 1912. The Smith family farm in Palmyra was purchased in 1907 by church members and passed on to the church in 1916. The grove of trees thought to be the site of the First Vision became a popular site for visitors during those years and hosted a centennial celebration in 1920 (118).

    The man in the back on the left side is Patriarch John Smith (1832-1911), half-brother of Joseph F. Smith. (The Church website features a good photograph of them taken in 1895.)

    Comment by Justin Butterfield — December 21, 2005 @ 1:53 pm

  5. Thanks, JB.

    Comment by John Mansfield — December 22, 2005 @ 10:35 am

  6. My great grandparents, Cassius and Hannah Robinson owned the farm that Joseph Smith was born on. They sold it to the church and he helped build the Joseph Smith Memorial. When I go to get genealogy on them, I can’t find anything. My Grandmother, Claudia, played the piano for the missionaries. They stayed on as caretakers. I have old black and white negatives of the Memorial and of the farm. My mother has newspaper clippings of the monument but does not know where she has put them as she moved a few months ago, and has not undone all boxes. I am trying to find any information on Cassius and Hannah Robinson that I can get my hands on. If you have any information at all, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Comment by Kari — January 26, 2006 @ 10:03 am

  7. Kari, I don’t know what information you currently have, but I found an entry for the Robinsons (Cassius, Hannah, and five children) in the 1900 Census. That’s all I could locate.

    Comment by Justin — January 26, 2006 @ 4:26 pm

  8. Thanks Justin, I do have that information. I was just wondering just how long they stayed, if it was until their deaths. I have a plaque typewritten on a piece of white burch bark off the farm written to my great granparents thanking them for having the farm, and letting the church buy it. It is dated 1911. I will always treasure it. Kari

    Comment by Kari Bragdon — December 15, 2006 @ 8:52 am