<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LDS Film Festival</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernacle.org/lds-film-festival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/lds-film-festival/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:16:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/lds-film-festival/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=269#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for that link Last Lemming. I think â€œBYU sweatshirts and hand-knit sweatersâ€ is a bit over-the-top in characterization, but thatâ€™s a nice article. Impressive to see that the festival has made the Post at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for that link Last Lemming. I think â€œBYU sweatshirts and hand-knit sweatersâ€ is a bit over-the-top in characterization, but thatâ€™s a nice article. Impressive to see that the festival has made the Post at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Lemming</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/lds-film-festival/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>Last Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=269#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s Washington Post style section has a big article on the film festival and LDS films in general.  Go to www.washingtonpost.com and click on the Big-Screen Religion story.  You will have to register.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Washington Post style section has a big article on the film festival and LDS films in general.  Go to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com</a> and click on the Big-Screen Religion story.  You will have to register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark Goble</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/lds-film-festival/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark Goble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=269#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>As I suggested  in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millennialstar.org/index.php/2006/01/20/states_of_grace_ii_the_return_to_the_the&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this M* thread&lt;/a&gt; I think Dutcher&#039;s pessimism is a bit misplaced.  I think the problem with &lt;i&gt;God&#039;s Army II&lt;/i&gt; is more just an issue with the way films are distributed and marketed today.  I just don&#039;t think LDS film makers ought count on being able to market the way they did in the past and can&#039;t count on profits from theatrical releases.  DVD is the way to go.  There are ways around this, but they require a rethinking of how LDS cinema functions.

While I think the Halestorm situation hasn&#039;t helped matters - bad LDS movies lead to a skeptical audience - I think that this situation really was inevitable.  Further I think some film makers like Dutcher simply make movies that will be difficult to get a large theatrical audience for, regardless of quality.  Look at the kind of films that make the big box office nationally and you&#039;ll get a good idea of what kind of films will do well in the LDS niche market.  Thoughtful dramas, for better or worse, don&#039;t do well in the current distribution environment except in exceptional situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I suggested  in <a href="http://www.millennialstar.org/index.php/2006/01/20/states_of_grace_ii_the_return_to_the_the" rel="nofollow">this M* thread</a> I think Dutcher&#8217;s pessimism is a bit misplaced.  I think the problem with <i>God&#8217;s Army II</i> is more just an issue with the way films are distributed and marketed today.  I just don&#8217;t think LDS film makers ought count on being able to market the way they did in the past and can&#8217;t count on profits from theatrical releases.  DVD is the way to go.  There are ways around this, but they require a rethinking of how LDS cinema functions.</p>
<p>While I think the Halestorm situation hasn&#8217;t helped matters &#8211; bad LDS movies lead to a skeptical audience &#8211; I think that this situation really was inevitable.  Further I think some film makers like Dutcher simply make movies that will be difficult to get a large theatrical audience for, regardless of quality.  Look at the kind of films that make the big box office nationally and you&#8217;ll get a good idea of what kind of films will do well in the LDS niche market.  Thoughtful dramas, for better or worse, don&#8217;t do well in the current distribution environment except in exceptional situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/lds-film-festival/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=269#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this, Clark. Past years of the LDS film festival have been fairly low key, but it looks like they had a lot of things going on this year. I must say I share some of Richard Dutcherâ€™s sentiments, expressed in his interview with M* a few months ago, about LDS cinema now being on the downhill. As such, itâ€™s encouraging to see things clearly picking up as far as the festival is concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, Clark. Past years of the LDS film festival have been fairly low key, but it looks like they had a lot of things going on this year. I must say I share some of Richard Dutcherâ€™s sentiments, expressed in his interview with M* a few months ago, about LDS cinema now being on the downhill. As such, itâ€™s encouraging to see things clearly picking up as far as the festival is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
