Comments on: Love or Confusion? http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/ Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:10:36 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Mark B. http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/#comment-15292 Mark B. Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:59:29 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=471#comment-15292 Not being a descendant of the Redd family, I have no opinion on the persistence of the Hardisons. Not being a descendant of the Redd family, I have no opinion on the persistence of the Hardisons.

]]> By: Chris Grant http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/#comment-15285 Chris Grant Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:36:27 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=471#comment-15285 Surprised that there's another LHR around; you can't swing a dead cat in Utah without hitting someone with pioneer heritage. In fact, I don't really get why the middle name persisted beyond John Hardison Redd, who got it as his mother's maiden name. Surprised that there’s another LHR around; you can’t swing a dead cat in Utah without hitting someone with pioneer heritage. In fact, I don’t really get why the middle name persisted beyond John Hardison Redd, who got it as his mother’s maiden name.

]]> By: Mark B. http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/#comment-15263 Mark B. Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:44:00 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=471#comment-15263 Surprised that there's another LHR around, or that he, with that pioneer heritage, could be accused of such a crime? Surprised that there’s another LHR around, or that he, with that pioneer heritage, could be accused of such a crime?

]]> By: Chris Grant http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/#comment-15125 Chris Grant Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:06:11 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=471#comment-15125 Mark B. writes: "<i>Lemuel Hardison Redd is a long-time Mormon name. One of the leaders of the Hole in the Rock expedition was Lemuel Hardison Redd Jr. So, since BRMcK’s middle name is Redd, it’s hardly surprising that one of his ancestors was Lemuel Hardison Redd.</i>" I only know of 4 Lemuel Hardison Redd's: father, son, and grandson pioneers and then the alleged kidnapper. The one you mention was the son; Elder McConkie was descended from the father but not the son. (I'm descended from the father's father, John Hardison Redd.) I wasn't expressing surprise that Elder McConkie's great grandfather was named Lemuel Hardison Redd; I was expressing surprise that the alleged kidnapper was. Mark B. writes:

“Lemuel Hardison Redd is a long-time Mormon name. One of the leaders of the Hole in the Rock expedition was Lemuel Hardison Redd Jr. So, since BRMcK’s middle name is Redd, it’s hardly surprising that one of his ancestors was Lemuel Hardison Redd.”

I only know of 4 Lemuel Hardison Redd’s: father, son, and grandson pioneers and then the alleged kidnapper. The one you mention was the son; Elder McConkie was descended from the father but not the son. (I’m descended from the father’s father, John Hardison Redd.)

I wasn’t expressing surprise that Elder McConkie’s great grandfather was named Lemuel Hardison Redd; I was expressing surprise that the alleged kidnapper was.

]]> By: Chris Grant http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/#comment-15120 Chris Grant Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:45:32 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=471#comment-15120 Ivan: Post #49 was written before I saw your post #48. Is your dissertation also the reason why you don't have time to back up your accusation that I was "[blaming] the victim"? Ivan:

Post #49 was written before I saw your post #48. Is your dissertation also the reason why you don’t have time to back up your accusation that I was “[blaming] the victim”?

]]> By: Chris Grant http://www.bloggernacle.org/love-or-confusion/#comment-15118 Chris Grant Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:39:13 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=471#comment-15118 Ivan: Paralipsis is the art of bringing up issues while claiming that you're not bringing up issues. That is exactly what you've done in discussing my alleged logical fallacies while simultaneously proclaiming your desire not to discuss them. Your repeated assertion of your unwillingness to debate me even as you continue to debate me is of the same flavor. Ivan:

Paralipsis is the art of bringing up issues while claiming that you’re not bringing up issues. That is exactly what you’ve done in discussing my alleged logical fallacies while simultaneously proclaiming your desire not to discuss them. Your repeated assertion of your unwillingness to debate me even as you continue to debate me is of the same flavor.

]]>