<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science and Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernacle.org/science-and-religion-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/science-and-religion-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:10:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark Goble</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/science-and-religion-4/#comment-3842</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark Goble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=322#comment-3842</guid>
		<description>Just to add, &lt;a href=&quot;http://rightreason.ektopos.com/archives/2006/02/one_cheer_for_d.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this discussion&lt;/a&gt; of Dennettâ€™s book over at Right Reason is worth a read.  Yes, the blogs are all abuzz discussing Dennett&#039;s book.  There are also lots of other websites discussing it.  (Many linked to in the comments at Jeffrey&#039;s blog)  I&#039;ll simply not link to them all but the Right Reason one is interesting.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add, <a href="http://rightreason.ektopos.com/archives/2006/02/one_cheer_for_d.html" rel="nofollow">this discussion</a> of Dennettâ€™s book over at Right Reason is worth a read.  Yes, the blogs are all abuzz discussing Dennett&#8217;s book.  There are also lots of other websites discussing it.  (Many linked to in the comments at Jeffrey&#8217;s blog)  I&#8217;ll simply not link to them all but the Right Reason one is interesting.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark Goble</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernacle.org/science-and-religion-4/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark Goble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=322#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>BTW - related to the Buttars bill controversy.   Over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/02/buttars_bill_goes_down.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dispatches from the Culture Wars&lt;/a&gt; discussion of the bill came this excellent response to Buttar&#039;s comment of &quot;there are a number of influential legislators who believe you evolved from an ape. I didn&#039;t.&quot; 

The response?

&quot;Better 6,000,000 years removed from apes than 6000 years removed from dirt.&quot;  

LOL.  Which of course doesn&#039;t really address the LDS &quot;literalist&quot; perspective.  But is still funny.  (I put literalist in quotations since I think with the JST the question of literalism is much more complex and doesn&#039;t necessarily entail the more Protestant conclusions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8211; related to the Buttars bill controversy.   Over at <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/02/buttars_bill_goes_down.php" rel="nofollow">Dispatches from the Culture Wars</a> discussion of the bill came this excellent response to Buttar&#8217;s comment of &#8220;there are a number of influential legislators who believe you evolved from an ape. I didn&#8217;t.&#8221; </p>
<p>The response?</p>
<p>&#8220;Better 6,000,000 years removed from apes than 6000 years removed from dirt.&#8221;  </p>
<p>LOL.  Which of course doesn&#8217;t really address the LDS &#8220;literalist&#8221; perspective.  But is still funny.  (I put literalist in quotations since I think with the JST the question of literalism is much more complex and doesn&#8217;t necessarily entail the more Protestant conclusions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
