Unrest at BYU-Take Two
I have underestimated the amount of dissent at BYU during the 1960s and early 1970s. Gary Bergera and Ron Priddis’s Brigham Young University: House of Faith documents a number of interesting incidents, mostly relating to the war.
Students expressed minority viewpoints on the Vietnam War through letters to the editor of the Daily Universe, columns of the BYU Young Democrats’ newsletter, and pieces in the underground newspaper, Zion’s Opinion, which ran from October 1968 to May 1969. One student, for instance, asked in a letter published in the Daily Universe: “Why should the [Vietnamese government] waste [its] own people when [it] can sucker American boys to blindly fight and die instead?” (p. 182). In a tribute to Hugh Nibley published in the May 2005 Sunstone, Omar Kader, a student at BYU during the time, wrote:
My fondest memory of Hugh is of working with him to publish a series of articles on Brigham Young’s views about war and preserving the environment in the BYU Young Democrat, a newsletter for our campus organization. The articles were printed in 1970, during the height of the furor over the Vietnam War, and much to the chagrin of the BYU administrators, whose job it was to keep even the scent of war protests out of campus life. I was president of the Young Democrats, and, because Hugh was one of us, it didn’t even occur to me that anything we did or thought was politically radical. All publications had to be submitted for approval by school officials, and many in the administration tried to block ours. However, they could not easily censor the commentary of the renowned Hugh Nibley. When Hugh contributed his articles, I always enjoyed watching the faces of certain administrators turn red when they realized how anti-war Hugh’s articles were. (p. 15)
Student organizations provided another forum for expressing political views. The Young Democrats was one of the small number of student political clubs recognized on campus. (Requests to organize chapters of the W.E.B. DuBois Club, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), and the Peace and Freedom Club were denied.) School officials apparently threatened to close down the Young Democrats on several occasions, including in 1969 when students placed a peace symbol in the Wilkinson Center, passed out anti-draft literature, and exhibited literature by Che Guevara and Malcolm X (p. 189-90).
In late 1968, the first major demonstration took place at BYU, when approximately 60 students wore black armbands at a speech by Curtis LeMay, the running mate of U.S. presidential candidate George Wallace. The students turned their backs on LeMay and applauded at inappropriate times to disrupt his address. In response school officials formulated a list of suggestions for addressing student disturbances and put together a student committee on student and civil unrest. Two years later school administrators adopted a civil disturbance plan (p. 184).
In March 1969 members of a “Free Student Coalition” delivered a list of sixteen demands to BYU officials, including demands for recognition of a student club called Mobilization for Peace, abolishment of ROTC class credit, and establishment of a civil rights week. Schools officials were not receptive.
In May 1969 President Wilkinson participated in an “interrogation” forum with nearly 300 students. He noted in his journal that he enjoyed the “give-and-take of [the] free discussion,” but felt that “from this confrontation, there is more unrest on the campus than there has been in any previous year” (p. 185). Also in May 1969 undergraduate students were asked to remove peace symbols from their dorm windows (p. 186). In the fall of 1969, Wilkinson had the school’s Code of Student Conduct changed to allow discipline in the event of “obstruction or disruption of teaching, researching, administration, disciplinary procedures, or other university activities.” Some students planned to participate in a nationwide boycott of classes in October 1969, but ASBYU officials voted to promote the idea that students should write their congressional representatives to express their opinions on the war. Some campus workshops and lectures on the war and pacificism were held during the boycott period (p. 185).
During the next several years President Wilkinson instructed BYU security officials to engage in surveillance of certain “radical” students. Some students who questioned BYU policies, including some who wrote letters to the editor of the Daily Universe, were watched by the Office of Student Life to learn if there were grounds for discipline (p. 186).
In May 1970 some students asked for authorization to collect signatures for a petition calling for gradual withdrawal of government funding for the war. School administrators responded by banning all petitions from campus. Several students challenged the move in the pages of the Daily Universe, one suggesting the existence of a double standard since an earlier petition had circulated at BYU supporting the war. Five days later school officials reversed course somewhat, allowing petitions “which do not violate the fundamental objectives of BYU” and had been given approval by school officials. A few days later school officials opted to deny services to students wearing armbands. One college dean asked faculty members to ask students not to wear armbands or to ask them to leave the classroom (p. 186-87).
In the fall of 1970 President Wilkinson distributed a flyer encouraging students to enroll in ROTC. A dozen students responded with a pamphlet that outlined legal alternatives to military service. One school official gave permission for the pamphlets to be circulated during a devotional, but Wilkinson condemned the pamphlet during the devotional. The same school official who had earlier approved circulation of the pamphlet wrote to a student leader rescinding his permission to distribute it (p. 187).
Also in the fall of 1970 a student club called Spectrum staged several anti-war skits entitled “Guerilla Theater” in the Varsity Theater. After complaints were filed, school officials closed down the production. Spectrum sponsored a discussion in early 1971 on the U.S. involvement in Vietnam which included Andrew Kimball, a grandson of President Kimball and a conscientious objector and returned missionary (p. 187-88).
One of the largest student protests at BYU, though, had nothing to do with Vietnam. In the early 1960s, more than 2000 students gathered at the football stadium, where they burned the dean of students in effigy and later egged the school cafeteria. The school was divided on the issue of whether the Christmas recess period should be extended (p. 183-84).



I’m not suprised at any of this really. Some of the students do doubt went too far. I have no doubt that many of the faculty went to far as well. Freedom of speech and opionion should be upheld by the LDS people, if not moreso than other people, due to our history of being snuffed out by nearly everyone else.
But hindsight is 20/20 they say.
Comment by Ian M. Cook — November 21, 2005 @ 1:02 pm
The biggest protest at BYU I recall was still the protesting at the New Kids on the Block concert at the Marriott. Rumor is that’s partially why concerts aren’t held on campus anymore.
Comment by Clark Goble — November 21, 2005 @ 2:28 pm
I’ve always marveled at how members of the political party that brought us the Vietnam war could so easily wash their hands of it and act like they had some moral superiority over the rest of us. Maybe that’s why I couldn’t stomach Nibley, even before I took a class from him and realized he was a total nut job.
Comment by Steve EM — November 21, 2005 @ 3:35 pm
I think it’s hilarious that the Office of Student Life was a kind of Strengthening Members Committee of its day.
Comment by NFlanders — November 21, 2005 @ 4:07 pm
Clark Goble:
A New Kids concert at the Marriott Center? When was this, 1990?
Also, were you able to get tickets to the concert? (Just kidding)
The idea of a concert at the Marriott Center does seem foreign to me. But I attended BYU in the post-New Kids era.
Comment by John Williams — November 21, 2005 @ 4:21 pm
I know this is about protest at BYU in the 1960s, but I remember some protesting going on at BYU in the late 1990s when the administration decided not to show Rodin’s sculpture, “The Kiss,” when the Rodin exhibit showed at the museum.
The chant went like this: “YOU MUST REMEMBER THIS… A KISS IS JUST A KISS!!”
Comment by Jordan Fowles — November 21, 2005 @ 6:39 pm
Steve EM,
Which political party brought us the Vietnam War?
Comment by Tim J. — November 21, 2005 @ 8:11 pm
Jordan -
I also recall (at a BYU devotional) President Hinckley’s not so subtle jab towards the students protesting the Rodin thing a ma jig.
http://speeches.byu.edu/reader/reader.php?id=2973&x=73&y=5
recently spoke on the campus of another university in this state . . . Most of them were institute students. They looked just the way you look. They were clean, well-groomed, and neatly dressed. They were eager and attentive. As high a percentage of them will be married in the temple as there will be of you. They were much better behaved than some few of you I saw on television the other night.
Comment by Ivan Wolfe — November 21, 2005 @ 9:37 pm
I was there for the Rodin thing. Not actually at the protest, but one of my roomates joined in for the heck of it. When a reporter asked him why he was there, he said that he didn’t know why others were there, but he was supporting grade inflation. The reporter gave him a strange look and withdrew.
I thought the decision not to show the sculpture was silly, as was the protest.
There was also an off-campus protest when Clarence Thomas came to be a judge in the law school’s moot court. I believe it was organized by VOICE. I remember reading the arguments in the Daily Universe while eating breakfast in the Cannon Center—-now I’m getting nastalgic (not for Cannon Center food).
BTW, Elton John once did a concert at the Marriott center.
Comment by Jared — November 21, 2005 @ 11:47 pm
I’m currently a student at BYU, and I gotta say, I pine for the days when Nibley was teaching there. Reading this makes me think I was born 40 years too late. As I was reading this, I had to do some double-takes to see if this was the same BYU I’m thinking of. But then I saw that people could get way more upset about Christmas break than the failure of the LDS community to “renounce war and proclaim peace,” and realized that, yep, yep that would be the BYU I know.
Comment by Steep Whitecracker — July 20, 2006 @ 7:45 pm
I like BYU.
Comment by john f. — July 21, 2006 @ 11:51 am
I love BYU to death, but I agree with Hugh Nibley:
“I can see two totally different pictures of the BYU, each one a reality: From one direction I see high purpose, sobriety, good cheer, dedication, and a measure of stability which in this unquiet world is by no means to be despised. Then by shifting my position but slightly I see a carnival of human vanity and folly to which only Gilbert & Sullivan could do justice, with solemn antics before high heaven that make the angels weep. Why take sides or contend? Both of the pictures are genuine!”
“Some Reasons for the Restored Gospel,” 7
Comment by Steep Whitecracker — July 21, 2006 @ 2:07 pm