http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/ Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:45:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/#comment-4376 Justin Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:43:29 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=348#comment-4376 I'm not sure, Nate. I only know about the discussion happenings via the Deseret News story. Lds.org recently posted another <a href="http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,40-1-3384-18,00.html" rel="nofollow">report</a>, but nothing is said about Keller-Davies. I’m not sure, Nate. I only know about the discussion happenings via the Deseret News story. Lds.org recently posted another report, but nothing is said about Keller-Davies.

]]> http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/#comment-4373 Nate Oman Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:56:13 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=348#comment-4373 Thanks for flagging this Justin. Did they talk at all about the general wierdness of some of the exchanges at the conference, ie the Keller-Davies tiff, etc.? Thanks for flagging this Justin. Did they talk at all about the general wierdness of some of the exchanges at the conference, ie the Keller-Davies tiff, etc.?

]]> http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/#comment-4314 john f. Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:05:52 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=348#comment-4314 Although, in checking out that T&S thread again, I notice he toned me down to make me sound more reasonable than in <a href="http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=2160#comment-61425" rel="nofollow">the comment</a> to which he might be referring. Although, in checking out that T&S thread again, I notice he toned me down to make me sound more reasonable than in the comment to which he might be referring.

]]> http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/#comment-4313 john f. Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:02:54 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=348#comment-4313 I don't think he participated on that thread. But I think he might have been quoting me with <i>chiasmus is solid evidence of the antiquity of the Book of Mormon</i> and Kaimi with <i>chiasmus proves absolutely nothing about anything in the Book of Mormon</i>. However, I told him about the thread at the time, hoping he might be interested in commenting. I don’t think he participated on that thread. But I think he might have been quoting me with chiasmus is solid evidence of the antiquity of the Book of Mormon and Kaimi with chiasmus proves absolutely nothing about anything in the Book of Mormon. However, I told him about the thread at the time, hoping he might be interested in commenting.

]]> http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/#comment-4312 Justin Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:52:18 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=348#comment-4312 My sense is that "Jack" on that thread is not Jack Welch (see, for example, comments 162-163). My sense is that “Jack” on that thread is not Jack Welch (see, for example, comments 162-163).

]]> http://www.bloggernacle.org/the-worlds-of-joseph-smith-conference-postmortem/#comment-4311 J. Stapley Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:40:42 +0000 http://www.bloggernacle.org/?p=348#comment-4311 Classic! Thanks for the rundown - Justin, the perspicacious. Classic! Thanks for the rundown – Justin, the perspicacious.

]]>